Prince of Persia: The Sands Of Time

  • Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time box office
    Rate Movie
    [Total: 25 Average: 3.8]
  • Directed By: Mike Newell
  • Written By: Boaz Yakin, Doug Miro, Carlo Bernard
  • Release Date: May 28, 2010
  • Domestic Distributor: Disney
  • Cast: Jake Gyllenhaal, Gemma Arterton, Ben Kingsley

Box Office Info:
Budget: $200 million Financed by: Disney
Domestic Gross: $90,759,676 Overseas Gross: $245,606,000

prince of persia film
Producer Jerry Bruckheimer optioned the Prince of Persia theatrical rights to the video game property in March 2004 for seven figures.  Prince of Persia: The Sands Of Time was fully financed by Disney with a huge $200 million price tag and Bruckheimer predicted this video game pic would spawn a new franchise as successful as The Pirates of the Caribbean.  Instead of a lucrative franchise, Disney took a massive unspecified write-down on Prince of Persia: The Sands Of Time and it joined the ranks as one of the biggest flops of 2010.  Bruckheimer, who was no stranger to bloated budgets and huge box office rewards for more than 25 years — began a downward trend the year prior with the disposable mega-budget kiddie pic G-Force (2009) and then the expensive flops Prince of Persia, Sorcerer’s Apprentice and The Lone Ranger, which led to his contract not being renewed at the mouse house in 2013.

Prince of Persia: The Sands Of Time was dated for the summer launching pad over the Memorial Day holiday frame on May 28, 2010 and Disney gave the expensive tentpole the full weight of their marketing machine.  The mouse house spent over $75M just on a domestic P&A blitz and launched a line of toys, Legos and costumes for this would-be blockbuster.  Disney also plastered ads in movie theaters in the top 30 markets, with aggressive advertising they dubbed “theater domination” — covering walls, staircases, ceilings, elevators and ticket machines with Prince of Persia promotions.

Reviews were mixed and Prince of Persia: The Sands Of Time bowed against the female skewing Sex And The City 2 and it disappointed with $30,095,259 — placing #3 behind Shrek Forever After and Sex And The City 2.  It sank 53.4% in its second weekend to $14,019,131 and fell 53.7% in its third frame to $6,486,150.  The domestic run closed with a less than blockbuster $90,759,676.

Prince of Persia: The Sands Of Time pulled in healthy numbers overseas with a $245.6 million gross, but it was not enough to pull the poor US numbers out of the red and the picture into profit.  The worldwide cume was $336.3 million.  Disney would see returned about $185 million after theaters take their percentage of the gross — which would cover the massive global P&A spend, but the theatrical receipts left most of the budget in the red.  Disney and Bruckheimer had a tough time in 2010 with their other collaboration The Sorcerer’s Apprentice also ending in a write-down just a few weeks later.


Leave a Reply
  1. This movie has a great story and I love the bond between tamina and dastan. This movie reminds me of the days when I use to play prince of Persia in my childhood although movie like this definately should have sequels but I’m disappointed it shouldn’t have one.

  2. This was an excellent family movie. When I watch movies with my kids, I always look for the “lessons learned.” Lessons such as decision making when you have conflicting advice, placing value on something that is valuable to someone else but not necessarily to you, or what you do with knowledge etc. it was all in this movie.

  3. We enjoyed the Prince of Persia/Sands of Time every time we watched it. Do not understand it’s lack of being top grosser for longer than it was. We’re in our late 79’s & 84 so we’ve seen more movies than you can count. Loved it! Keep playing it………..

  4. A very heart warming movie…. Authentic story great chemistry bet tamina and dastan.. Nothing to be uttered bad about this movie.

  5. It was a very good film. I watched it many times. I was hoping for a sequel. It would have done well with normal advertising.

  6. Personally, I thought the film was very good, and pretty faithful to the game in all the ways they could replicate. Helps they didn’t adapt The Warrior Within.

    • Agreed. I actually liked it a lot too and I’ve seen it more times than I care to admit, although I wish they could’ve cast someone else as the princess and that they could’ve shown more of the traps (like the spikes in the floors, that kind of thing), but I really wish things worked out better for the film.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *